Best Baseball Card Scanner | #1 is for any sport card in 2023

We have tested the best baseball card scanner and we will let you know which of the 4 we think it is. In the test we have taken into account the characteristics we think are best suited for this task

The first thing we looked at is image quality and resolution, given that a lot of these cards will be posted online and users want to see them at high quality

Another important thing is paper handling, given that most cards are thick stock and the paper is not the kind used with regular documents

Also, we looked at the software a bit, because we also want to have a bit of freedom when when you want to save the cards to different file formats, or even indexing when we have large quantities

Best Baseball Card Scanner | #1 is for any sport card in 2023
ProductFormatScanning areaConnectivitySheets per minuteImages per minuteADF SizeDaily Duty CyclePrice
Our choice

Fujitsu fi-7160

Fujitsu fi-7160
A48.27 in x 11.69 inUSB 3.06012080 sheets4,000 sheetsClick for more info

Panasonic KV-S5055C

Panasonic KV-S5055C
A311.69 in x 16.54 inUSB 3.080160200 seets300 sheetsClick for more info

Fujitsu fi-7460

Fujitsu fi-7460
A311.69 in x 16.54 inUSB 3.060120100 sheets9,000 sheetsClick for more info

Alaris Kodak i2900

Alaris Kodak i2900
A48.27 in x 11.69 inUSB 2.060120250 sheets10,000 sheetsClick for more info


Let’s have a look at each product in particular.

Fujitsu fi-7160

ProductFormatScanning areaConnectivitySheets per minuteImages per minuteADF SizeDaily Duty CyclePrice

Fujitsu fi-7160

Fujitsu fi-7160
A48.27 in x 11.69 inUSB 3.06012080 sheets4,000 sheetsClick for more info
Let’s start with the FI 7160 and see how it performs. First thing first, we took a regular card, around 250gsm and ran it through the scanner. It actually moved quite well, the scanner did what it was supposed to do. Nothing to complain about here.

The second card we took was a bit thicker and laminated. The pickup rolls played with it a bit and then it managed to move them through the scanner. A colleague of mine had a good idea and recommended we clean the rolls with a special roll cleaner we use. The movement became much smoother and it went through the scanner perfectly.

Such a solution will work but given the laminated nature of the card, I guess it gathers more dirt and lint on it, and probably you will have to clean the rollers a bit more often than usual.

Now to the image quality. The first card had a matt finish which means the image quality was as expected. Fujitsu is well known for the quality of the CCD so I would not expect anything less.

Regarding the glossy laminated card, I was really impressed that it came out very good as well. I would have expected it to come out with slight reflections but it was not the case. One option I do recommend is the normal image mode, don’t run it in automatic mode.

There are risks when you are doing that because the driver will try to optimize each image. It will work well with office documents, but cards are a different animal, so run the normal mode, or even the bright mode if images are a bit dark. As long as you are working with a fixed threshold on the image mode, the results should be perfect.

Panasonic KV-S5055C

ProductFormatScanning areaConnectivitySheets per minuteImages per minuteADF SizeDaily Duty CyclePrice

Panasonic KV-S5055C

Panasonic KV-S5055C
A311.69 in x 16.54 inUSB 3.080160200 seets300 sheetsClick for more info
You probably already know our bias towards CCD-capturing units. It’s not that CIS is bad, but especially for scanning sports cards, we want the perfect image quality.

The Panasonic KV-S5055C is the only scanner from Panasonic to offer a CCD unit. That is why we included it in our test and we thought about it as a good scanner for sport cards.

Compared to the Fujitsu, I must say the biggest difference is the paper path. While the Fujitsu is a face down scanner, this is face up, which means you have to put the stack of cards in the ADF facing up.

This means that in the real world, the card will enter the scanner and come back out 180 degrees, which means it will have to rotate during the process.

Luckily, with the regular card, it seems to go through the scanner quite well. We had no issues, the pick up rolls did a good job at feeding it through the scanner, and things went really smoothly. I actually took a batch of 10 similar cards and ran them 3 times. No problems whatsoever.

With the laminated one, I was expecting to have more issues. It went perfectly through the scanner, and the feeding mechanism worked brilliantly. So i went and got a larger batch of laminated cards and tried again.

Here things changed and what I noticed is the same thing as with the Fujitsu. I had to clean the rollers at regular intervals and the process would run quite well.

What is interesting on this, and especially for cards, is the ImageCapture Plus software. There is a feature when you save the documents after scanning, that is very intuitive to scan to different folders. It would not work for large batches of documents, but for card scanning it’s just brilliant.

Fujitsu fi-7460

ProductFormatScanning areaConnectivitySheets per minuteImages per minuteADF SizeDaily Duty CyclePrice

Fujitsu fi-7460

Fujitsu fi-7460
A311.69 in x 16.54 inUSB 3.060120100 sheets9,000 sheetsClick for more info
We also wanted to test the FI 7460, but we only included it because it also allows you to scan A3 documents. So you would think why on earth would it make any sense to buy it for sports cards?

Well, the guy that sent us the cards for testing, and we thanked him for it, also told us he collects posters of baseball and basketball players. We did not think much at first but we asked him if this is a regular thing among collectors. He told us that pretty much everyone he knows has these, so we asked him to send some samples of those.

Scanning results were similar to the Ricoh Fujitsu FI 7160. We did notice something different though, because the Ricoh 7460 is A3, the feeding mechanism is slightly different to accommodate for bigger documents. What this means is that it feeds both the laminated and the regular cards easier. It did require the same amount of cleaning, but it just felt that the feeding was smoother and easier.

Now, back to the posters, these were folded A3 posters. We ran them through the scanner with the normal image mode and the results were pretty impressive. I then went on and tried the bright mode, which I sometimes prefer, especially when we scan documents with pictures. We got to this because some customers were of the opinion the images were a bit dark, and that’s how we discovered the bright mode.

The images had good quality, they were a bit brighter than on the paper, but all in all the colors were matching and the cards looked really well on screen.

Alaris Kodak i2900

ProductFormatScanning areaConnectivitySheets per minuteImages per minuteADF SizeDaily Duty CyclePrice

Alaris Kodak i2900

Alaris Kodak i2900
A48.27 in x 11.69 inUSB 2.060120250 sheets10,000 sheetsClick for more info
The last unit we wanted to include is the i2900 from Alaris Kodak. This is a neat little scanner and comes with the famous imaging functions from Kodak. The capturing unit is CCD which means you can expect scanning accuracy and relatively good color matching.

But the reason we included this unit is that it also has a flatbed unit attached to it. This is really important given that there will be some cards, especially really thick stock or premium cards with embossed elements, which won’t go through the ADF unit.

So for this device, we focused solely on the flatbed unit. We got our hands on some really rare ( and very expensive ) embossed baseball cards. For example, in one case, all the caps of the players were embossed, almost 1mm in thickness. Even if it might have gone through the ADF, there would have been a risk of damage to them.

So we scanned it on the flatbed unit and looked at it. Because this is a ccd unit, the scanner was able to output everything pretty much on focus. I did see some weird small shadows around the cap, but it was nothing critical. It looked perfectly fine and I was really satisfied with the result.

I then tried a really thick laminated card, which definitely would have not worked automatically. The results were near perfect, there was no gloss feel or reflections in the image. It was just perfect and was really happy with the result.


Which baseball card scanner should I buy?


First thing first, let’s talk money. If you want to spend the least on it, get the Ricoh Fujitsu FI 7160. It’s by far the cheapest and it has really good image quality. It comes with a straight paper path, so most cards in our test went through the scanner with no issue.


If you also want to scan baseball posters, you will need an A3 scanner. In this case, we would recommend the Fujitsu FI 7460. It is the cheapest A3 scanner on the market that can offer the image quality you require for sports cards. In our test, the posters came out brilliantly color-wise, and also the creases on them were not visible in the final image.


Last but not least, let’s talk embossed sports cards. For that, you will need a scanner that also has a Flatbed unit included. We chose the Alaris Kodak i2900 because it is the perfect combination of a CCD ADF unit, which can offer good image quality, and a flatbed unit which can handle the embossed sports cards.


Our Score

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.